RESTORATION AND MITIGATION OF WETLANDS
MAIN INDEX
When discussing wetlands in Florida, the word "mitigation" often comes up. Mitigation is
the creation, enhancement, or preservation of wetlands. It is done in order to
compensate for wetlands that have been damaged, destroyed, or otherwise disturbed by permitted
development activities. Restoration is a term also used when discussing wetlands
and their disturbance.
To make matters more confusing, each of these terms has a different meaning.
- Restoration is defined by the National Research Council as the "return of an
ecosystem to a close approximation of its condidtion prior to disturbance." This usually involves
reconstructing the physical features of the wetland, adjusting soil and water chemistry, and
reintroducing native plants and animals.
- Creation is the construction of a wetland where one did not exist before. Also termed
"constructed wetlands", this type of mitigation is usually difficult and has a low success rate.
Wetlands are created in order to provide wastewater or stormwater treatment, or to replace or
produce natural habitat.
- Enhancement is the alteration of an existing wetland to improve one or more specific
functions. However, changing one wetland feature may negatively affect another.
Mitigation is an umbrella term for attempting to improve or replace one or more wetland features
that have been lost. Given the high rate of development that is taking place in the United States
today, significant amounts of wetlands are being lost. Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act seeks to offset these losses by requiring that any wetlands destroyed by activities such as
highway construction, coastal drainage, or commercial development be replaced.
Mitigation is a relatively new practice and most projects are less than twenty years old. A 1991
report by the Department of Environmental Regulation (now the DEP) assessed the effectiveness
of mitigation wetlands in Florida. The report was to determine if the new wetlands were
functioning properly (ecologically successful) and if they were in compliance with the regulations
of the permit. Results ranged from minor problems such as reports not being submitted to major
ones such as no mitigation being attempted at sites where wetland loss has occurred. Less
than half of the created saltwater wetlands functioned naturally, and in some cases, only 10% of
the created freshwater wetlands worked at all.
Attempting to recreate or replace what was lost sounds like a good idea in theory. In reality
however, it is difficult to mimic the complex and connected systems that nature created the first
time.
For more information about mitigation and wetlands, see other pages on our website:
Wetland terminolgy
Constructed wetlands and water treatment
Lake Tohopekaliga enhancement
The Creators
This page was authored by Becca Hassell
with assistance from Tara Muncaster and Aimee
Lyons.
Data is from the APIRS
database.
This page was designed and is managed by Becca Hassell.
Vic Ramey is the editor.
DEP review is by Jeff Schardt and Judy Ludlow.
MAIN INDEX
A collaboration of
the Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, University of Florida,
and the Invasive Plant Management Section of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
CAIP-WEBSITE@ufl.edu
Copyright 2004 University of Florida