OVERVIEW of the PROCESS
Inspections, Workplans, Permitting, Funding

MAIN INDEX | The process | Eligible waters |
| The timeline | Workplans | Annual reports |

The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is designated by the Florida Legislature to be the state's lead agency for controlling invasive aquatic plants (as well as invasive terrestrial plants). This authority is carried out by the DEP's Bureau of Invasive Plant Management (BIPM), and has been since 1972.

DEP's authority for managing aquatic plants is delineated in Chapters 369.20 and 369.22, Florida Statutes. While the framework is addressed in the statutes, policies, rules and funding are addressed in Chapter 62C-54, Florida Administrative Code (here is a PDF file of 62C-54).

The BIPM contracts with other public agencies or with private companies to manage plants in public waters. Funding is not sufficient for plant management in all waters, therefore BIPM funds control only in public waters. Other government authorities or property owners are responsible for plant management in canals, private waters, and sovereignty waters that do not have public access.


THE PROCESS
There are approximately
450 eligible water bodies in Florida covering more than 1.26 million acres of fresh water.

BIPM's regional biologists ("RBs") inspect each of the eligible water bodies at least once each year. Waters with extensive problems and management programs are inspected several times. Additionally, biologists from the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, US Army Corps of Engineers, water management districts, and local governments periodically inspect public waters and convey observations to the BIPM.

Inspections by RBs result in early detection and rapid deployment of management crews. Inspections also provide an assessment of exotic plant and management impacts on waters, and provide information essential in establishing management priorities. Invasive plant levels are recorded once per year at approximately the same time each year to provide a record through time of the effects of exotic plants and management programs. Plant levels are discussed among reviewing agency staff and are used to measure the percent of waters that are under "maintenance control" as well as to estimate the following year's budget necessary to achieve or sustain maintenance control.

The Timeline
Each February 1, the BIPM's Aquatic Plant Management Section in Tallahassee mails applications to government agencies with aquatic plant management programs, or to the BIPM's regional biologists, to develop management plans for all eligible waters on which private companies are contracted to control aquatic plants (list of government contractors). A workplan request is submitted for each water body, comprised of a list of plants that need to be controlled, control methods, and an estimated budget.

The Workplans
The Aquatic Plant Management Section receives workplan requests by mid-March.

Here is a workplan for Lake Rousseau (PDF, 116k), and here is a workplan for Lake Istokpoga (PDF, 111k).
Section staff reviews the workplan requests for completeness and forwards them to appropriate reviewing agencies. Reviewers include the BIPM's regional biologists, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as well as other groups or individuals that have expressed interest in the workplans. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service receives copies when management operations may impact endangered species.

Reviewers return comments to the Aquatic Plant Management Section by the first week of May. Then, reviewers and government contractors have a number of meetings in strategic locations around the state during the second week of May to discuss proposed plans for each water body.

These work plan review meetings have two primary purposes:

First, all affected agencies have an opportunity to comment on, and help develop, management programs well in advance of actual operations. There is often only a narrow window of opportunity to control aquatic plants; delays caused by agency concerns during optimum control periods can be costly and environmentally damaging. The meetings help obviate concerns and delays.

Second, since funding is not sufficient to control all nuisance and invasive plants in all public waters, the meetings allow managers to establish statewide control priorities and contingency plans if priority projects are not conducted.

Most of the BIPM's "Legislative Spending Authority" is allocated into contracts by July 1, which is the beginning of the state's fiscal year, so that local governments can establish their spending plans and workforce requirements for the year. Executed contracts substitute for aquatic plant control permits to avoid duplication of efforts. About $1,000,000 of the annual $29 million budget is held in reserve to cover unforeseen contingencies between July 1 and mid-February.

Hydrilla control usually makes up about 3/4 of the state's aquatic plant control budget. Under optimum conditions, most large-scale hydrilla control operations begin in January or February. Just prior to this control period, waters in which major hydrilla operations are scheduled are re-examined and management plans are amended as necessary. Fiscal amendments may include assigning contingency funds or modifying contracts, and may even require recalling funds from one contractor to redistribute to another with greater need.

Workplan modifications are made as necessary throughout the year following the same agency review process described earlier. Program-wide funding reallocations are usually made in February and again in early May. The May reallocation is the last opportunity to shift funds among contractors prior to the end of the state fiscal year on June 30.

Although general workplans are approved each May, the exact treatment dates are not established. Contractors therefore notify the BIPM and appropriate reviewing agencies by fax or email 1-2 weeks in advance of actual operations. This allows time to ensure that operations can proceed as originally planned, or can be modified if conditions have changed.

Contractors keep weekly logs of plants controlled, methods used, and expenses incurred for each water body in which control was conducted. These forms are compiled and submitted to the BIPM with an invoice by the 20th of the month following the month in which operations were conducted. Regional biologists conduct random inspections of each contractor's work along with routine inspections of general plant levels to evaluate contractor effectiveness and adherence to workplan specifications.


ANNUAL REPORT
Plant level and control records are compiled into an annual report which is posted on the
DEP Bureau of Invasive Plant Management. This report allows policy makers to better evaluate the status of the aquatic plant management program and to determine the level of funding for the ensuing fiscal year (click here for the most recent annual report on the Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters).

In this way, the BIPM has operated under performance-based and needs-based budgeting since the Bureau's creation in 1972.


Visit these other pages of this web site for further information:

More details about aquatic plant management permitting

Why manage aquatic plants? Our philosophy.

What is "maintenance control"?


The Creators of this Web Site

This page was authored by Jeff Schardt.

Karen Brown is the editor.
This page is maintained by Beth DeGroat.

MAIN INDEX


A collaboration of the Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, University of Florida, and the Invasive Plant Management Section of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.


CAIP-WEBSITE@ufl.edu
Copyright 2006 University of Florida