OVERVIEW of the PROCESS
Inspections, Workplans, Permitting, Funding
MAIN INDEX
| The process
| Eligible waters |
| The timeline |
Workplans
| Annual reports |
|
DEP's authority for managing aquatic plants is delineated in Chapters 369.20 and 369.22, Florida Statutes. While the framework is addressed in the statutes, policies, rules and funding are addressed in Chapter 62C-54, Florida Administrative Code (here is a PDF file of 62C-54).
|
THE PROCESS
BIPM's regional biologists ("RBs") inspect each of the eligible water bodies at least once each
year. Waters with extensive problems and management programs are inspected several times.
Additionally, biologists from the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, US Army Corps of
Engineers, water management districts, and local governments periodically inspect public waters
and convey observations to the BIPM.
Inspections by RBs result in early detection and rapid deployment of management crews.
Inspections also provide an assessment of exotic plant and management impacts on waters, and
provide information essential in establishing management priorities. Invasive plant levels are
recorded once per year at approximately the same time each year to provide a record through
time of the effects of exotic plants and management programs. Plant levels are discussed among
reviewing agency staff and are used to measure the percent of waters that are under "maintenance control" as well as to estimate the following year's
budget necessary to achieve or sustain maintenance control.
The Workplans
Reviewers return comments to the Aquatic Plant Management Section by the first week of May.
Then,
reviewers and government contractors have a number of meetings in strategic locations around
the state during the second week of May to discuss proposed plans for each water body.
These work plan review meetings have two primary purposes:
Second, since funding is not sufficient to control all nuisance
and invasive plants in all public waters, the meetings allow managers to establish statewide control
priorities and contingency plans if priority projects are not conducted.
Most of the BIPM's "Legislative Spending Authority" is
allocated into contracts by July 1, which is the beginning of the state's fiscal year, so
that local governments can establish their spending plans and workforce requirements for the
year. Executed contracts substitute for aquatic plant control permits to avoid duplication of
efforts. About $1,000,000 of the annual $29 million budget is held in reserve to cover
unforeseen contingencies between
July 1 and mid-February.
Workplan modifications are made as necessary throughout the year following the same agency
review process described earlier. Program-wide funding reallocations are usually made in
February and again in early May. The May reallocation is the last opportunity to shift funds
among
contractors prior to the end of the state fiscal year on June 30.
Although general workplans are approved each May, the exact treatment dates are not
established. Contractors therefore notify the BIPM and appropriate reviewing agencies by fax or
email 1-2 weeks in advance of actual operations. This allows time to ensure that operations can
proceed as originally planned, or can be modified if conditions have changed.
Contractors keep weekly logs of plants controlled, methods used, and
expenses incurred for each water body in which control was conducted. These forms
are compiled and submitted to the BIPM with an invoice by the 20th of the month following the
month in which operations were conducted. Regional biologists conduct
random inspections of each contractor's work along with routine inspections of
general plant levels to evaluate contractor effectiveness and adherence to workplan specifications.
ANNUAL REPORT
In this way, the BIPM has operated under performance-based and needs-based budgeting since the
Bureau's creation in 1972.
More details about aquatic plant management permitting
Why manage aquatic plants? Our philosophy.
What is "maintenance control"?
This page was authored by Jeff Schardt.
Karen Brown is the editor.
A collaboration of
the Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, University of Florida,
and the Invasive Plant Management Section of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
There are approximately 450 eligible water
bodies in Florida covering more
than 1.26 million acres of fresh water.
The Timeline
Each February 1, the BIPM's Aquatic Plant Management Section in Tallahassee mails
applications to government agencies with aquatic plant management programs, or to the BIPM's regional
biologists, to develop management plans for all eligible waters on which private companies
are contracted to control aquatic plants (list of government contractors). A workplan request is submitted for each
water body, comprised of a list of plants that need to be controlled, control methods, and an
estimated budget.
The Aquatic Plant Management Section receives workplan requests by mid-March.
Here is a
workplan for Lake Rousseau (PDF, 116k), and here is a
workplan for Lake Istokpoga (PDF, 111k).
Section staff
reviews the workplan requests for completeness and forwards them
to appropriate reviewing agencies. Reviewers include the
BIPM's regional biologists, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers as well as other groups or individuals that have expressed interest in the
workplans. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service receives copies when management operations may
impact endangered species.
First, all affected agencies have an opportunity
to comment on, and help develop, management programs well in advance of actual operations.
There is often only a narrow window of opportunity to control aquatic plants; delays caused by
agency concerns during optimum control periods can be costly and environmentally damaging.
The meetings help obviate concerns and delays.
Hydrilla control usually makes up about 3/4 of the state's aquatic plant control
budget. Under optimum conditions, most large-scale hydrilla control operations
begin in January or February. Just prior to this control period, waters in which major hydrilla
operations are scheduled are re-examined and management plans are amended as necessary. Fiscal
amendments may include assigning contingency funds or modifying contracts, and may even
require recalling funds from one contractor to redistribute to another with greater need.
Plant level and control records are compiled into an annual
report which is posted on the DEP Bureau of Invasive Plant Management. This report allows
policy makers to better evaluate the status of the aquatic plant management program and to
determine the level of funding for the ensuing fiscal year (click here for the most recent annual
report on the Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters).
This page is maintained by Beth DeGroat.
CAIP-WEBSITE@ufl.edu
Copyright 2006 University of Florida