WATER-USE RESTRICTIONS
for Aquatic Herbicides Used in Florida

This is a supplementary part of the Herbicidal Control page of this web site.

Main Index


AFTER AN APPLICATION OF AQUATIC HERBICIDE, certain water-use restrictions may apply.

Often, the person who applies an aquatic herbicide is required to notify other water users and the general public before and after the fact. Often, the person who applies an aquatic herbicide places notices in the newspapers, and/or posts signs on sticks around the treated area. Often, herbicide applicators notify the public, whether they're required to notify the public or not.

Whatever the label says to do, including notifying others of water-use restrictions, then the aquatic herbicide user must do. The label is federal law.


WATER-USE RESTRICTIONS FOR AQUATIC HERBICIDES

Herbicide

Distance to Potable Water Intake

Potable Water Tolerance

Water-Use Restrictions

Copper

0

1.0-1.3 ppm

No restrictions

Diquat

120 m

0.05 ppm

Potable water 1-3 days
Livestock 1 day
Irrigation non-crop 1-3 days
Irrigation crop 5 days

Endothall

Not specific

0.5 ppm

Livestock 7-25 days
Irrigation 7-25 days
Potable water 7-25 days

Fluridone

>20 ppb - 1320 ft

150 ppb

Irrigation 7-30 days

Glyphosate

300 m

0.7 ppm

300 m from intake

Imazapyr

is being used

under an

Experimental Use Permit

Triclopyr

1.5 km

No

Potable water 21 days
Irrigation 14 days

2, 4-D

Not specified

0.03 ppm

Do not use for irrigation
on susceptible crops;
otherwise,
Irrigation 21 days
Potable water 21 days

As shown in the table above, there can be considerable variation among the required use-restriction periods for the various aquatic herbicides used in Florida.

Therefore, the need to use water from an area to be treated influences the choice of herbicide to be used.

For examples,

  • the table shows that there are no water use restrictions imposed after the use of copper for aquatic plant management. Swimming, drinking, fishing, irrigation and other uses all are allowed immediately.
  • the table shows that when diquat is used, there are restrictions on drinking, livestock use, and irrigation; however there are no restrictions on fishing and swimming.
  • the table shows that when endothall is used to manage aquatic plants.
  • the table shows that when triclopyr is used in aquatic plant management, there are water-use restrictions imposed on drinking the water and using the water for irrigation. However, there are no restrictions for recreational use of the water, such as swimming, and there are no restrictions on consuming fish from treated water.
  • Thus, these legally required water-use restrictions may postpone or prevent the use of a herbicide in a particular multi-use water body.


    The Creators

    This page was authored by Vic Ramey with research assistance from Sara Reinhart.
    Data is from the APIRS database.
    Photography and graphics are by Ann Murray, Sara Reinhart and Vic Ramey.

    DEP review by Jeff Schardt and Judy Ludlow.

    Main Index


    A collaboration of the Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, University of Florida, and the Invasive Plant Management Section of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.


    CAIP-WEBSITE@ufl.edu
    Copyright 2003 University of Florida