Skip to main content
UF Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences logo
Give      University of Florida
Resources
    Quick Links
    • Plant Directory
    • Podcast
    • Contact CAIP
    Toggle Search Form
    GIVE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
    • HOME
    • About the Center
          • About Us
          • Who We Are
          • Contact Us
    • Why Manage Plants?
          • Native Plants
          • Non-native Invasive Plants
          • Aquatic and Wetland Plants in Florida
          • Florida’s Most Invasive Plants
          • Why Manage Plants? It’s the Law
    • Florida's Waters
          • Public Waters
          • Waterbody Types
          • Water Quality
          • Shared Uses and Functions
          • Fish and Wildlife
    • Control Methods
          • Biological Control
          • Chemical Control
          • Mechanical Control
          • Physical Control
    • Management Plans
          • Scope of Aquatic Plant Management
          • Biological Control Considerations
          • Chemical Control Considerations
          • Mechanical Control Considerations
          • Physical Control Considerations
          • Maintenance Control Strategy
          • Aquatic Plant Management Agencies
          • Integrated Plant Management
    • Resources

         

          • Subheading 1
          • Link 1
          • Link 2
          • Link3
          • Link 4
          • Subheading 2
          • Link 5
          • Link 6
          • Link 7
          • Link 8
          • Subheading 3
          • Link 9
          • Link 10
          • Link 11
          • Link 12
          • Subheading 4
          • Link 13
          • Link 14
          • Link 15
          • Link 16
          • Subheading 5
          • Link 17
          • Link 18
          • Link 19
          • Link 20

    Center For Aquatic And Invasive Plants

    Center For Aquatic And Invasive Plants

     Section 4 - Header
    • plants.ifas.ufl.edu
    • Management Plans
    • Chemical Control Considerations
    • Glyphosate Considerations

    Glyphosate Considerations

    NDPES Logo

    *Important: See Reference Guide Beforehand

    No single herbicide is appropriate for controlling all invasive aquatic plants (or nuisance growths of native aquatic plants), in all situations. A herbicide may perform differently depending on the waterbody, its use, the time of year—or even the time of day. Therefore, aquatic plant managers must have a thorough understanding of how each herbicide acts in Florida aquatic systems. The following parameters are evaluated when considering this herbicide to manage aquatic plants in a specific waterbody. Each parameter is linked to an explanation and examples are provided to demonstrate their relevance to developing comprehensive aquatic plant management strategies.

    These considerations are not meant to replace or contradict the EPA approved label.
    Always read and follow the pesticide label for each product used.


    thumbnail image

    Table A: Herbicide Use Patterns for Glyphosate

    Target Plant Scientific Name Use Pattern Compatible Herbicides
    Torpedograss Panicum repens Frequent Alone or with imazapyr
    Cuban club-rush Cyperus blepharoleptos Frequent Alone or with flumioxazin, Sometimes with 2,4-D
    Paragrass Urochloa mutica Frequent Usually used alone
    Tussocks Mixed floating masses of herbaceous plants – often mixed with woody plant species Frequent Alone or with imazapyr, Sometimes with diquat or 2,4-D
    Tropical American Watergrass Luziola subintegra Frequent Usually used alone
    Floating plants Water hyacinth or water hyacinth/water lettuce mix Frequent Alone or with 2,4-D
    Cattail Typha spp. Frequent Alone
    Primrose willow Ludwigia octovalvis / L. peruviana Common Alone or with flumioxazin, Sometimes with 2,4-D
    West Indian marsh grass Hymenachne amplexicaulis Common Alone or occasionally with 2,4-D
    Spatter-dock Nuphar advena Occasional Alone
    Willows Salix spp. Occasional Alone or with 2,4-D

    Table B: Water Uses and Functions

    Water Use Parameters Management Considerations
    Downstream Uses and Needs
    • Applications made to moving bodies of water must be made heading upstream
      • Prevents concentrations of glyphosate in one area
    Fish and Wildlife Mgmt.  
    Vegetation planting
    • Avoid applications within emergent aquatic plant revegetation sites, especially grass species
    Forage and prey
    • No issues related to this tool
    Fisheries
    • Acute Toxicity bluegill (96 hr LC50) = 120 mg/L
    • Acute LC50 for rainbow trout > 2500 mg/L.
    Non-game wildlife
    • Material is practically non-toxic to aquatic organisms on an acute basis
      • LC50 or EC50 is > 100 mg/L in most sensitive species tested
    Endangered species
    • No issues related to this tool
    Waterfowl
    • Practically non-toxic to birds on an acute basis – LD50 > 2,000 mg/kg
    • Oral LD50, Bobwhite quail > 3,800 mg/kg
    Flood Control
    • No issues related to this tool
    Navigation and Access
    • No issues related to this tool
    Irrigation
    • No irrigation restrictions on the use of treated water
    Livestock Consumption
    • No livestock watering restrictions
    Potable Water
    • Do not apply within ½ mile upstream of a functioning potable water intake, or
      • Within 1/2 mile of a functioning potable water intake in static water
    • Coordinate applications with water facility operator
    • Applications within 1/2 mile of potable water intake can be made if:
      • The intake is shut down for 48 hours, or
      • An approved laboratory analysis indicates the glyphosate concentration is below 0.7ppm
    Recreation  
    Boating
    • No issues related to this tool
    Fishing
    • No fish consumption restrictions
    Hunting
    • No issues related to this tool
    Swimming
    • No swimming restrictions

    Table C: Herbicide, Waterbody, Plant, and Climate Parameters

    Herbicide Parameters Management Considerations
    Herbicide Rate
    • 0.5 mg/L – not applied to water; only to foliage of emergent vegetation
    • Maximum 7.5 pt / ac
    Breakdown / Inactivation
    • Half-life in ponds reported from 12-60 days
    Microbial
    • Broken down microbially, primary pathway
    Adsorption
    • Highly adsorbed on most soils, especially soils with high organic content
    Photolysis
    • Minor breakdown pathway
    Hydrolysis
    • Not sensitive to hydrolysis
    Dissipation
    • Not active in water and will not kill submersed plants
    • Binds tightly with soil so runoff is low
    Formulation  
    Liquid
    • Available in liquid formulation only
    Solid
    • Not available in solid formulation
    Mechanism of Action
    • Classified in WSSA Resistance Grouping #9
      • Enzyme inhibitor – (Enolpyruvyl Shikimate-3-Phosphate (EPSP) Synthase Inhibitor)
    Mode of Action  
    Systemic
    • Absorbed by foliar tissues only
    • Moves to areas of new growth
    • Prevents formation of essential aromatic amino acids in plants
      • Without these essential amino acids, the plant cannot make proteins, enzymes, etc.
      • Plant cannot continue growing and eventually starves and dies
    Plant Growth Regulator
    • Not used as a plant growth regulator
    Stewardship  
    Herbicide resistance
    • Resistance issues reported in terrestrial applications
    • No examples of resistance reported in FL aquatic use patterns
    • Rotate or use with another active ingredient where appropriate
    Waterbody Parameters Management Considerations
    Hydrology  
    Water depth
    • No issues related to this tool, used only for floating and emergent plant control
    Water volume
    • No issues related to this tool, used only for floating and emergent plant control
    Water movement
    • Dissipation not an issue related to this tool
      • Used only for floating and emergent plant control
      • Applied directly to above-water leaves or stems
    Water chemistry  
    Dissolved oxygen (DO)
    • Use caution for larger applications to control plants in warm water to avoid DO depletion
    pH, alkalinity, hardness
    • No issues related to this tool
    Nutrient content
    • No issues related to this tool
    Water transparency
    • No issues related to this tool
    Sediment characteristics  
    Composition
    • Sand/Clay – no issues related to this tool, applied only to leaves of floating or emergent plants
    • Organic – no issues related to this tool, applied only to leaves of floating or emergent plants
    • No pre-emergence or soil activity
    Potential for re-suspension
    • Avoid disturbing sediments in shallow water if drawing for tank mixes
    Plant Physiology Parameters Management Considerations
    Plant origin / growth potential  
    Native
    • Cattail, willow, tussocks
      • Applied at 7.5 pt / ac
      • Used for spot or large-scale control
      • Rotational or combinational tool with imazamox, imazapyr, or 2,4-D
    • Spatter-dock
      • Applied at 7.5 pt /ac
      • Used with tryclopyr and 2,4-D
    Non-native
    • Primrose willow
      • Applied at 7.5 pt /ac
    Invasive

     

    • Torpedograss, Cuban club-rush, paragrass, tropical American watergrass, West Indian marsh grass
      • Applied at 7.5 pt /ac alone or 6 pt + 2 pt imazapyr
    • Floating plants (water hyacinth / water lettuce)
    Plant growth stage (target/non-target)
    • Lower rates may be applicable for young actively growing plants
    Plant susceptibility (target/non-target)
    • Apply to actively growing target plants
    • No activity on submersed plants
    • Good efficacy for cattail and most grasses
      • Control is relatively fast and long duration
    • Not as effective controlling torpedograss in standing water
      • Increase effectiveness by combining with imazapyr
      • Minimize non-target effects by altering dose, timing, or use alternative herbicide
    • Toxic to most grasses – avoid overspray onto desirable grasses
    Potential for regrowth (target/non-target)
    • Very effective for long-term control for cattail and most grasses
    • Avoid contact with comingled non-target plants, especially native grasses
    Climate Parameters Management Considerations
    Weather Daily

     

    • Need at least six hours of contact for maximum effectiveness
    • Avoid application in winds greater than 10 mph

    Seasonally

    • Apply only to actively growing plants
    Light intensity
    • No issues related to this tool
    Water temperature
    • No issues related to this tool – not applied directly to water

    Table D: Other Parameters

    Parameter Management Considerations
    Cost
    • Generics available
    • Alternative herbicides available for some plants controlled by glyphosate
    Anticipated Control Amount  
    Spatial
    • Controls only emergent and floating plants to which it is applied
    • No activity in submersed plants
    Duration
    • Provides long term control for most grasses
      • Torpedograss is an exception
      • Glyphosate does not translocate well in plant tissues below the water surface
    Time to Achieve Control
    • Yellowing symptoms in 2-3 days
    • Control in 2-3 weeks
      • Much longer for floating plants
    Contractor/Equipment
    • Apply by hand gun and airboat for small acreages of floating and emergent plants
    • Apply aerially by helicopter for larger acreages of cattail, torpedograss and Tropical American watergrass
    University of Florida Logo
    Contact

    Feedback
    UF / IFAS Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants
    7922 NW 71 Street Gainesville, FL 32653
    (352) 392-9613

    Land Grant Mission
    • Teaching
    • Research
    • Extension
    Information
    • Ask IFAS (EDIS)
    • UF/IFAS Experts
    • UF/IFAS Blogs
    • UF/IFAS Bookstore
    Policy
    • Accessible UF
    • EEO Statement
    • IFAS Web Policy
    • SSN & UF Privacy
    • Analytics (Google Privacy)

    © 2025 University of Florida, IFAS Last Modified:Wed, 16 Apr 2025 15:39:08 EDT