Skip to main content

Center For Aquatic And Invasive Plants

Center For Aquatic And Invasive Plants

Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants Logo    Plant Management in Florida Waters

Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants Logo    Plant Management in Florida Waters

NDPES Logo

*Important: See Reference Guide Beforehand

No single herbicide is appropriate for controlling all invasive aquatic plants (or nuisance growths of native aquatic plants), in all situations. A herbicide may perform differently depending on the waterbody, its use, the time of year—or even the time of day. Therefore, aquatic plant managers must have a thorough understanding of how each herbicide acts in Florida aquatic systems. The following parameters are evaluated when considering this herbicide to manage aquatic plants in a specific waterbody. Each parameter is linked to an explanation and examples are provided to demonstrate their relevance to developing comprehensive aquatic plant management strategies.


Table A: Herbicide Use Patterns for Carfentrazone

Target PlantScientific NameUse PatternCompatible Herbicides
Uruguayan primrose willow complex Ludwigia grandiflora/hexapetala Occasional Combined with imazamox

Table B: Water Uses and Functions

Water Use ParametersManagement Considerations
Downstream Uses and Needs
  • Do not apply within ¼ mile upstream of functioning potable intake in rivers
Fish and Wildlife Mgmt.  
Vegetation planting
  • No issues related to this tool
Forage and prey
  • No issues related to this tool – potential for bioaccumulation is low
Fisheries
  • Moderately toxic to fish
    • 96-hour LC50 = 1.6 mg/L in rainbow trout and 2.0 mg/L in bluegill sunfish
  • Daphnia magna 48-hour LC50 > 10 mg/L
Non-game wildlife
  • No issues related to this tool
Endangered species
  • No issues related to this tool at operational rates (~4.0 oz/ac) and strategies
Waterfowl
  • Non-toxic to waterfowl
    • Mallard duck and bobwhite quail oral LD50 > 2,250 mg/kg
Flood Control
  • No issues related to this tool
Navigation and Access
  • No issues related to this tool
Irrigation
  • Do not use treated water for 1 day after application to < 20% of waterbody
  • Do not use treated water for 14 days after application to > 20% of waterbody
Livestock Consumption
  • Do not use water for livestock consumption for I day after applying to 20-50% of waterbody
Potable Water
  • Do not apply within 1/4 mile of functioning potable water intake in lakes
  • Do not apply within 1/4 mile upstream of functioning potable intake in rivers
Recreation  
Boating
  • No issues related to this tool
Fishing
  • No fish consumption restriction – does not bioaccumulate in fish
Hunting
  • No issues related to this tool
Swimming
  • No swimming restriction

Table C: Herbicide, Waterbody, Plant, and Climate Parameters

Herbicide ParametersManagement Considerations
Herbicide Rate
  • Apply at 4.0 oz/ac with 32 oz/ac imazamox to control Ludwigia grandiflora/hexapetala
Breakdown / Inactivation
  • Short half-life in water depending on season and water depth – see hydrolysis
Microbial
  • Microbial metabolism is primary degradation pathway in soil – half-life < 1.5 days
Adsorption
  • Does not bind in sediments or adsorb to soil particles
Photolysis
  • Susceptible to photolytic degradation
Hydrolysis
  • Primary degradation pathway in water
  • Half-life of 3-5 days in water
Dissipation
  • Minimal with the very short half-life and use pattern of foliar applications
Formulation  
Liquid
  • Available as a liquid formulation which is emusifiable in water
Solid
  • Not available in solid formulations
Mechanism of Action
  • Classified in WSSA Resistance Grouping #14
    • Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PPO) enzyme inhibitor
Mode of Action  
Contact
  • Inhibits protoporphyrinogen oxidase enzyme important in chlorophyll synthesis
  • Absorbed through the leaves – does not move in the plant
  • Causes formation of a light-absorbing chlorophyll precursor outside of the chloroplast
    • This compound absorbs energy from sunlight, but cannot pass through the Z-scheme
    • Energy is passed on to oxygen, creating radical oxygen and cell membrane disruption
Plant Growth Regulator
  • Not used as a plant growth regulator in Florida aquatic plant control applications
Stewardship  
Herbicide resistance
  • No tolerance or resistance issues reported in Florida
  • Resistance has been reported for PPO inhibitors in terrestrial applications
    • Rotate or combine with other active ingredient where appropriate
Waterbody ParametersManagement Considerations
Hydrology  
Water depth
  • Not an issue with FL use pattern – foliar applications to emergent plants
Water volume
  • Not an issue with FL use pattern – foliar applications to emergent plants
Water movement
  • Not an issue with FL use pattern – foliar applications to emergent plants
Water chemistry  
Dissolved oxygen (DO)
  • Not an issue with FL use pattern – foliar applications to small areas of emergent plants
pH, alkalinity, hardness
  • Not an issue with FL use pattern – foliar applications to emergent plants
  • Does not bind with organic or clay particles in tank mix
Nutrient content
  • Not an issue with FL use pattern – small-scale emergent plant management
Water transparency
  • Not an issue with FL use pattern – foliar applications to emergent plants
Sediment characteristics  
Composition
  • Sand / Clay – no issues related to this tool
  • Organic – no issues related to this tool
Potential for re-suspension
  • No issues related to this tool
  • Does not adsorb to suspended material in water body or in tank mix water
Plant Physiology ParametersManagement Considerations
Plant origin / growth potential  
Native
  • Not used to target native plants in FWC Programs
Non-native
  • Not used to target non-native plants in FWC Programs
Invasive

  • Ludwigia grandiflora/hexapetala
    • Applied directly to leaves at 4.0 oz/ac + 32 oz/ac imazamox
    • Not confirmed if carfentrazone adds long-term efficacy above imazamox alone
    • May provide faster control
      • Rapid shoot burndown may reduce translocation, reducing long-term control
    • Addition of carfentrazone may reduce selectivity somewhat to comingled plants
Plant growth stage (target/non-target)
  • Need actively growing plants for herbicide uptake
  • L. grandiflora/hexapetala has high submersed rhizome vs above water leaf / shoot mass
    • Early spring foliar applications may be ineffective – not enough above-water mass
    • Floating / submersed leaves not effectively controlled with foliar treatment
    • Follow-up applications may be necessary for late summer, dense, woody growth
Plant susceptibility (target/non-target)
  • Does not control adjacent knotgrass, torpedograss, pickerelweed, turfgrass
Potential for regrowth (target/non-target)
  • Injury to comingled non-target plants is usual minimal with eventual regrowth
Climate ParametersManagement Considerations
Weather Daily

  • Needs 1-2 hours of contact for good herbicidal activity

Seasonally

  • Need actively growing target plants for herbicide uptake
Light intensity
  • Not an issue with FL use pattern – foliar applications to emergent plants
Water temperature
  • Not an issue with FL use pattern – foliar applications to emergent plants

Table D: Other Parameters

ParameterManagement Considerations
Cost
  • No generics available
  • Similar chemistry available with flumioxazin
  • Generally more expensive than 2,4-D or diquat
Anticipated Control Amount
Spatial
  • Control is confined to the area to which carfentrazone is directly applied to target plants
Duration
  • Efficacy improves when applying to actively growing plants with high emergent leaf/shoot biomass
Time to Achieve Control
  • Symptoms in 2-5 days – control in 3-4 weeks
Contractor/Equipment
  • Foliar applications by backpack, airboat for small-scale applications to Ludwigia spp.
back to top