Skip to main content
UF Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences logo
Give      University of Florida
Resources
    Quick Links
    • Plant Directory
    • Podcast
    • Contact CAIP
    Toggle Search Form
    GIVE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
    • HOME
    • About the Center
          • About Us
          • Who We Are
          • Contact Us
    • Why Manage Plants?
          • Native Plants
          • Non-native Invasive Plants
          • Aquatic and Wetland Plants in Florida
          • Florida’s Most Invasive Plants
          • Why Manage Plants? It’s the Law
    • Florida's Waters
          • Public Waters
          • Waterbody Types
          • Water Quality
          • Shared Uses and Functions
          • Fish and Wildlife
    • Control Methods
          • Biological Control
          • Chemical Control
          • Mechanical Control
          • Physical Control
    • Management Plans
          • Scope of Aquatic Plant Management
          • Biological Control Considerations
          • Chemical Control Considerations
          • Mechanical Control Considerations
          • Physical Control Considerations
          • Maintenance Control Strategy
          • Aquatic Plant Management Agencies
          • Integrated Plant Management
    • Resources

         

          • Subheading 1
          • Link 1
          • Link 2
          • Link3
          • Link 4
          • Subheading 2
          • Link 5
          • Link 6
          • Link 7
          • Link 8
          • Subheading 3
          • Link 9
          • Link 10
          • Link 11
          • Link 12
          • Subheading 4
          • Link 13
          • Link 14
          • Link 15
          • Link 16
          • Subheading 5
          • Link 17
          • Link 18
          • Link 19
          • Link 20

    Center For Aquatic And Invasive Plants

    Center For Aquatic And Invasive Plants

     Section 4 - Header
    • plants.ifas.ufl.edu
    • Management Plans
    • Chemical Control Considerations
    • Triclopyr Considerations

    Triclopyr Considerations

    NDPES Logo

    *Important: See Reference Guide Beforehand

    No single herbicide is appropriate for controlling all invasive aquatic plants (or nuisance growths of native aquatic plants), in all situations. A herbicide may perform differently depending on the waterbody, its use, the time of year—or even the time of day. Therefore, aquatic plant managers must have a thorough understanding of how each herbicide acts in Florida aquatic systems. The following parameters are evaluated when considering this herbicide to manage aquatic plants in a specific waterbody. Each parameter is linked to an explanation and examples are provided to demonstrate their relevance to developing comprehensive aquatic plant management strategies.

    These considerations are not meant to replace or contradict the EPA approved label.
    Always read and follow the pesticide label for each product used.


    thumbnail image

    Table A: Herbicide Use Patterns for Triclopyr

    Target Plant Scientific Name Use Pattern Compatible Herbicides
    Tussocks Floating and emergent herbaceous and woody species Occasional Used alone
    Primrose willow Ludwigia octovalvis/peruviana Occasional Used alone

    Table B: Water Uses and Functions

    Water Use Parameters Management Considerations
    Downstream Uses and Needs
    • No issues related to this tool
    Fish and Wildlife Mgmt.  
    Vegetation planting
    • Avoid drift and potential damage to adjacent susceptible plants
    Forage and prey
    • No issues related to this tool
    Fisheries
    • Formulated triclopyr practically non-toxic to fish
      • Rainbow trout LC50 – 96-hour ~552 mg/L
      • Bluegill sunfish LC50 – 96-hour ~891 mg/L
    Non-game wildlife
    • No issues related to this tool
    Endangered species
    • Avoid drift and potential damage to susceptible plants in endangered species habitat
    Waterfowl
    • Non-toxic to waterfowl
      • Mallard duck LC50 > 5,000 ppm
    Flood Control
    • No issues related to this tool
    Navigation and Access
    • No issues related to this tool
    Irrigation
    • Do not use treated water for 120 days following application, or
    • Triclopyr level at the water intake is determined by laboratory analysis to be < 1.0 ppb or less
    Livestock Consumption
    • There are no restrictions on livestock consumption of treated water
    • Do not allow lactating dairy animals to graze treated areas until the next growing season
    Potable Water
    • Variable setback distances from functioning potable water intake
      • Depend on size and rate of application – consult label for specifics
    • To apply within setback distances, the intake must be shut off until the triclopyr level at the water intake is determined to be < 0.4 ppm
    Recreation  
    Boating
    • No issues related to this tool
    Fishing
    • No fish consumption restrictions
    Hunting
    • No issues related to this tool
    Swimming
    • No swimming restrictions

    Table C: Herbicide, Waterbody, Plant, and Climate Parameters

    Herbicide Parameters Management Considerations
    Herbicide Rate
    • Foliar applications generally at 3-8 quarts / acre with non-ionic surfactant
    • Basal bark applications generally at 10% solution with methylated seed oil
    Breakdown / Inactivation
    • Short half-life in water depending on season and water depth – see photolysis
    Microbial
    • Microbial metabolism is primary degradation pathway in soil – half-life ~45 days
    Adsorption
    • Does not bind strongly or adsorb to soil particles
    Photolysis
    • Primary degradation pathway in water
      • Half-life of 2.5 days (shallow water/summer) to 14 days (deep/winter)
    Hydrolysis
    • Not sensitive to hydrolysis
    Dissipation
    • Not used to control submersed plants in Florida – not applied directly to water
      • Does not adsorb to soils – may be more persistent and more mobile in soils
    Formulation  
    Liquid
    • Available in liquid formulation
    Solid
    • Available in solid formulation combined with 2,4-D amine salt
    Mechanism of Action
    • Classified in WSSA Resistance Grouping #4
      • Auxin mimic
    Mode of Action  
    Systemic
    • Absorbed by foliage and translocates throughout plant tissues
    • Moves to areas of new growth and causes a disruption in hormone levels
    • Interferes with normal expansion and division of plant cells
      • Acts like a growth stimulant in some plant tissues and a growth retardant in others
      • Symptoms include cupped leaves and twisted stems
      • Vascular tissue becomes crushed, stops movement of essential nutrients and sugars
      • Plant essentially grows itself to death
    Plant Growth Regulator
    • Not used as a plant growth regulator in Florida aquatic plant control applications
    Stewardship  
    Herbicide resistance
    • No tolerance or resistance issues reported in Florida
    • Rotate or use with 2,4-D, imazapyr, or glyphosate where appropriate
    Waterbody Parameters Management Considerations
    Hydrology  
    Water depth
    • No issues related to this tool
      • Not used for in-water applications at this time in FWC-funded programs
    Water volume
    • No issues related to this tool
      • Not used for in-water applications at this time in FWC-funded programs
    Water movement
    • No issues related to this tool
      • Not used for in-water applications at this time in FWC-funded programs
    Water chemistry  
    Dissolved oxygen (DO)
    • Slow acting herbicide used for shoreline applications and spot control within secluded marshes
      • DO is less concern
    pH, alkalinity, hardness
    • No issues related to this tool
    Nutrient content
    • Slow acting herbicide used for shoreline applications and spot control within secluded marshes
    Water transparency
    • No issues related to this tool
      • Not used for in-water applications at this time in FWC-funded programs
    Sediment characteristics  
    Composition
    • Sand/Clay – no issues related to this tool
    • Organic – no issues related to this tool
    Potential for re-suspension
    • No issues related to this tool
    • Does not readily adsorb to suspended material in tank mix water
    Plant Physiology Parameters Management Considerations
    Plant origin / growth potential  
    Native
    • Evaluated for spatter-dock (Nuphar advena) control
      • Ineffective even at high rates and applied with 2,4-D
    • Tussocks – mixed floating masses of woody and herbaceous plants
      • Foliar applications at 3-8 qt / ac
      • Usually applied with glyphosate, 2,4-D, or imazapyr
    Non-native
    • Primrose willow
      • Foliar application at ~1.0 gpa
      • In-water application at 1-2 ppm with 2,4-D
    Invasive

     

    • Not applied to control invasive plants in FWC-funded program at this time
    Plant growth stage (target/non-target)
    • Need actively growing plants for herbicide uptake
    • May need higher rates for mature plants
    Plant susceptibility (target/non-target)
    • Auxin-like activity
    • Controls woody and broadleaf plants
    • Most grasses and other monocots are tolerant
    • Apply to actively growing target plants
    • Apply when potential for drift is minimal to avoid damage to non-target plants
    Potential for regrowth (target/non-target)
    • Kills roots of susceptible plants allowing longer control than herbicides that only kill standing crop
    Climate Parameters Management Considerations
    Weather Daily

     

    • Rainfast in about two hours after application
    • May damage adjacent woody or susceptible broadleaf plants due to drift
      • Subject to FL DACS organo-auxin rule – 5E-2.033 F.A.C.
      • Applications prohibited in winds above 10 mph

    Seasonally

    • Selectivity increases in winter when non-target plants like buttonbush are dormant
    Light intensity
    • May break down faster in clearer water or in more direct summer light
    Water temperature
    • No issues related to this tool

    Table D: Other Parameters

    Parameter Management Considerations
    Cost
    • Generics are available
    • Other herbicides with similar target plant control and use patterns are available
    Anticipated Control Amount  
    Spatial
    • Area of control is generally confined to the area to which triclopyr is directly applied
    Duration
    • Kills roots of susceptible plants allowing longer control than herbicides that only kill standing crop
    Time to Achieve Control
    • Symptoms in as little as 24 hours
    • Complete kill in several weeks after application
    Contractor/Equipment
    • Foliar applications by backpack for spot control
    • Airboat or ATV for small-scale applications

     

    University of Florida Logo
    Contact

    Feedback
    UF / IFAS Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants
    7922 NW 71 Street Gainesville, FL 32653
    (352) 392-9613

    Land Grant Mission
    • Teaching
    • Research
    • Extension
    Information
    • Ask IFAS (EDIS)
    • UF/IFAS Experts
    • UF/IFAS Blogs
    • UF/IFAS Bookstore
    Policy
    • Accessible UF
    • EEO Statement
    • IFAS Web Policy
    • SSN & UF Privacy
    • Analytics (Google Privacy)

    © 2025 University of Florida, IFAS Last Modified:Wed, 16 Apr 2025 14:55:17 EDT